πππ The virus is fake. The pandemic is fake.
Here is a list of some of the people calling this the Greatest HOAX in All of Human History:
Del Bigtree,
Reiner Fuellmich,
Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano,
Claire Edwards,
Max Igan,
David Icke,
Heiko SchΓΆning,
Robert F. Kennedy Jr,
Dr. Roger Hodkinson
Dr Andrew Kaufman
Dr VA Shiva Ayyadurai
Dr. Rashid Buttar.
Peggy Hall
Dr Sherri Tenpenny
Dr Pam Popper
Gemma O'Doherty
Dr. Vernon Coleman
Dr. Roger Hodkinson (Alberta's top Epidemiologist)
πππ Excess Deaths not caused by a virus but instead caused by a) Medical Malpractice and b) Effects of the Lockdown
⚫ This section Work-In-Progress
⏩ Supporting links coming soon
πππ Huge Spike of excess deaths beginning at the end of March 2020 resembles system responding to external perturbation, and not typical epidemic curves expected according to Farr's Law
⚫ This section Work-In-Progress
⏩ Supporting links coming soon
πππ Most economic impacts seen now, including food shortages and disruption of supply lines, more likely a consequence of Peak Oil
⚫ This section Work-In-Progress
⏩ Supporting links coming soon
πππ Evidence of a planned pandemic and “reboot of capitalism” over the last 20 years
20 Years of Pandemic Simulations:
• Dark Winter (2001) • Atlantic Storm (2005) • Operation Lockstep (2010) • SPARS (2017) • Clade X (2018) • Crimson Contagion (2019) • Event201 (2019) • COVID-19 (2020) ..... "We're in a Live Exercise here." -- Mike Pompeo, 3/20/2020
⚫ This section Work-In-Progress
⏩ Supporting links coming soon
πππ Asymptomatic transmission is rare
⚫ New study in Wuhan China published in Nature, nearly 10 million subjects, no evidence of asymptomatic transmission
⚫ Anthony Fauci: “In all the history of respiratory borne viruses, of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person. Even if there's a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers.” -- 2/28/2020
πππ Masks are INEFFECTIVE, UNNECESSARY and UNSAFE.
Masks have nothing to do with Public Health. Masks are all about CONTROL.
π There have now have been 7 studies on the efficacy of masks at stopping the spread of infectious disease. The latest one had specifically studied COVID-19. They all came to the same conclusion: Masks Are Useless.
⚫ Denis Rancourt’s review of the published literature
If masks are INEFFECTIVE, UNNECESSARY, AND UNSAFE, then why are 7.7B people being forced to wear them? Because this is not about public health. It's about CONTROL.
πππ The suspect pathogen, SARS-nCoV-2, has never been isolated.
⚫ Christian Drosten (lead of PCR test development): “In the present case of 2019-nCoV, virus isolates or samples from infected patients have so far not become available to the international public health community. We report here on the establishment and validation of a diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV screening and specific confirmation, designed in absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens. Design and validation were enabled by the close genetic relatedness to the 2003 SARS-CoV, and aided by the use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.”
⚫ Discovery Salud: Frauds and falsehoods in the medical field. The scam is confirmed: PCR does not detect SARS-Cov-2 (This goes into great detail about the gene sequence of the purported virus)
⚫ CDC document “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel” which states
The analytical sensitivity of the rRT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/Β΅L) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.
⚫ This article has a very interesting timeline of events. It states that the suspect pathogen SARS-nCoV-2 was sequenced on January 5, and published online January 11th. There was no peer review, and on January 5, the Chinese authorities were still reporting that there was no evidence of human to human transmission..
And, in fact, Zhang insists he first uploaded the genome to the U.S. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) on Jan. 5—an assertion corroborated by the submission date listed on the U.S government institution’s Genbank. “When we posted the genome on Jan. 5, the United States certainly knew about this virus,” he says. But it can take days or even weeks for the NCBI to look at a submission, and given the gravity of the situation and buoyed by the urging of colleagues, Zhang chose to expedite its release to the public, by publishing it online. It’s a decision that facilitated the swift development of testing kits, as well as the early discussion of antivirals and possible vaccines.
πππPCR is not a diagnostic test, and CANNOT determine viral load, or if someone is infected, symptomatic, or sick or not!
⚫ Here is Kary Mullis, the biochemist to won a Nobel Prize for inventing the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR):
“With PCR, you can find almost anything in anybody. it starts making you believe in the Buddhist notion that everything is contained in everything else…. Because if you can amplify one single molecule, up to something you can really measure, which PCR can do, … There's just very few molecules that you don't have just one of in your body… [PCR] doesn't tell you if you are sick, or whether the thing was going to hurt you”.
πππ There is no such infectious disease called COVID-19. There was no rigorous epidemiological method followed to prove that the suspect pathogen causes the new unnamed syndrome, which I call “Wuhan Sudden Onset Atypical Pneumonia Syndrome”, because this is how it was first described.
⚫ Bill Huston Podcast on Germ Theory of Disease, Epidemiology 101, in the early days of COVID-19, showing problems with the epidemiological method used, and problems with the timeline