Sunday, November 29, 2020

Peak Oil (Hubbert's Peak) resources

If you have never heard of Peak Oil, or doubt the science behind it, these resources may be helpful.

 Bill Huston, WilliamAHuston@gmail.com


  • M. King Hubbert

1956 paper: http://www.energycrisis.com/Hubbert/1956/1956.pdf

Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M._King_Hubbert


  • What does a Post Peak Oil World look like?

https://youtu.be/jrJ89-O_H5E





  • Thom Hartmann Last Hours of Ancient Sunlight
    (book)


  • Last Hours film (focus on climate change only)

  https://youtu.be/9n4jau44_do


  • End of Suburbia

https://youtu.be/Q3uvzcY2Xug


  • Crude Awakening oil crash

https://youtu.be/7qGM9ypR-UI


  • There's No Tomorrow

https://youtu.be/VOMWzjrRiBg


  • Sid Smith “how to enjoy the end of the world”

https://youtu.be/5WPB2u8EzL8


  • What a Way to Go

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNDgXJR7DsY

  • Endgame Derick Jensen (General resource depletion, not strictly about peak oil)





Thursday, November 26, 2020

Bill Huston's Omnibus Pandemic Musings



πŸ“—πŸ“—πŸ“— The virus is fake. The pandemic is fake. 

Here is a list of some of the people calling this the Greatest HOAX in All of Human History:

  • Del Bigtree, 
  • Reiner Fuellmich, 
  • Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, 
  • Claire Edwards, 
  • Max Igan, 
  • David Icke, 
  • Heiko SchΓΆning, 
  • Robert F. Kennedy Jr,  
  • Dr. Roger Hodkinson
  • Dr Andrew Kaufman
  • Dr VA Shiva Ayyadurai
  • Dr. Rashid Buttar.
  • Peggy Hall 
  • Dr Sherri Tenpenny 
  • Dr Pam Popper
  • Gemma O'Doherty
  • Dr. Vernon Coleman
  • Dr. Roger Hodkinson (Alberta's top Epidemiologist)


πŸ“—πŸ“—πŸ“— Excess Deaths not caused by a virus but instead caused by a) Medical Malpractice and b) Effects of the Lockdown

⚫ This section Work-In-Progress

⏩ Supporting links coming soon

πŸ“—πŸ“—πŸ“— Huge Spike of excess deaths beginning at the end of March 2020 resembles system responding to external perturbation, and not typical epidemic curves expected according to Farr's Law

⚫ This section Work-In-Progress

⏩ Supporting links coming soon

πŸ“—πŸ“—πŸ“— Most economic impacts seen now, including food shortages and disruption of supply lines, more likely a consequence of Peak Oil

⚫ This section Work-In-Progress

⏩ Supporting links coming soon

πŸ“—πŸ“—πŸ“— Evidence of a planned pandemic and “reboot of capitalism” over the last 20 years

20 Years of Pandemic Simulations:

• Dark Winter (2001)
• Atlantic Storm (2005)
• Operation Lockstep (2010)
• SPARS (2017)
• Clade X (2018)
• Crimson Contagion (2019)
• Event201 (2019)
• COVID-19  (2020)  .....
     "We're in a Live Exercise here."
   
         -- Mike Pompeo, 3/20/2020

⚫ This section Work-In-Progress

⏩ Supporting links coming soon

πŸ“—πŸ“—πŸ“— Asymptomatic transmission is rare

⚫ New study in Wuhan China published in Nature, nearly 10 million subjects, no evidence of asymptomatic transmission

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w

⚫ WHO official Dr Maria Van Kerkhove: asymptomatic transmission is very rare

https://youtu.be/NQTBlbx1Xjs



⚫ Anthony Fauci:  “In all the history of respiratory borne viruses, of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person. Even if there's a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers.” -- 2/28/2020

https://youtu.be/LSHIpx60nr4


πŸ“—πŸ“—πŸ“— Masks are INEFFECTIVE, UNNECESSARY and UNSAFE.

Masks have nothing to do with Public Health. Masks are all about CONTROL.

πŸ“— There have now have been 7 studies on the efficacy of masks at stopping the spread of infectious disease. The latest one had specifically studied COVID-19. They all came to the same conclusion: Masks Are Useless.

⚫ Denis Rancourt’s review of the published literature

⏩  https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy

⚫ The new Danish study specifically looking at COVID-19, over 3,000 participants:

https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817

https://youtu.be/7ykcUbwsfK4


If masks are NOT EFFECTIVE, then they are also UNNECESSARY. So why are 7.7B people being forced to wear them?

Because this is not about public health. it's about CONTROL.

πŸ“—Masks create an unsafe environment within seconds of use.

⚫ Masks create unsafe CO2 levels within seconds of used according to OSHA standards:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ypLjmXQoLygi/


⚫ OSHA trainers turned whistleblowers describe the fallacies around current mask policy 

https://thehighwire.com/videos/mask-whistleblowers-tell-all/

If masks are INEFFECTIVE, UNNECESSARY, AND UNSAFE, then why are 7.7B people being forced to wear them? Because this is not about public health. It's about CONTROL.

πŸ“—πŸ“—πŸ“— The suspect pathogen, SARS-nCoV-2, has never been isolated.

⚫ Christian Drosten (lead of PCR test development): “In the present case of 2019-nCoV, virus isolates or samples from infected patients have so far not become available to the international public health community. We report here on the establishment and validation of a diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV screening and specific confirmation, designed in absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens. Design and validation were enabled by the close genetic relatedness to the 2003 SARS-CoV, and aided by the use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988269/

⚫ Andrew Kaufman humanity is not the virus

https://youtu.be/KGGd7-vvd9Y


⚫ SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 Testing & Isolation Claims, Published on November 12, 2020, Written by  Saeed A. Qureshi, Ph.D.

https://principia-scientific.com/discredited-cdc-sars-cov-2-covid-19-testing-isolation-claims/

⚫ Discovery Salud: Frauds and falsehoods in the medical field. The scam is confirmed: PCR does not detect SARS-Cov-2  (This goes into great detail about the gene sequence of the purported virus)

Original in Spanish: 

https://www.dsalud.com/reportaje/la-estafa-se-constata-la-pcr-no-detecta-el-sars-cov-2/

(unofficial English translation)

https://archive.org/details/the-scam-has-been-confirmed-pcr-does-not-detect-sars-cov-2

Detailed Analysis:

https://off-guardian.org/2020/11/17/covid19-evidence-of-global-fraud/

⚫ CDC document “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel” which states

The  analytical  sensitivity  of  the  rRT-PCR  assays  contained  in  the  CDC  2019  Novel  Coronavirus  (2019nCoV) Real-Time  RT-PCR  Diagnostic  Panel were  determined  in  Limit  of  Detection  studies.  Since  no quantified  virus  isolates  of  the  2019-nCoV  are  currently  available,  assays  designed  for detection  of  the 2019-nCoV  RNA  were  tested  with characterized stocks  of in  vitro  transcribed  full  length  RNA  (N  gene; GenBank  accession:  MN908947.2)  of known  titer  (RNA  copies/Β΅L)  spiked  into  a  diluent  consisting  of a suspension  of  human  A549  cells  and  viral  transport  medium  (VTM)  to  mimic  clinical specimen.

https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

⚫ For reference here is the purported gene sequence as published 1/10/2020: 

https://virological.org/t/novel-2019-coronavirus-genome/319

⚫ This article has a very interesting timeline of events. It states that the suspect pathogen SARS-nCoV-2 was sequenced on January 5, and published online January 11th. There was no peer review, and on January 5, the Chinese authorities were still reporting that there was no evidence of human to human transmission..

And, in fact, Zhang insists he first uploaded the genome to the U.S. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) on Jan. 5—an assertion corroborated by the submission date listed on the U.S government institution’s Genbank. “When we posted the genome on Jan. 5, the United States certainly knew about this virus,” he says. But it can take days or even weeks for the NCBI to look at a submission, and given the gravity of the situation and buoyed by the urging of colleagues, Zhang chose to expedite its release to the public, by publishing it online.  It’s a decision that facilitated the swift development of testing kits, as well as the early discussion of antivirals and possible vaccines.

https://time.com/5882918/zhang-yongzhen-interview-china-coronavirus-genome/

πŸ“—πŸ“—πŸ“—PCR is not a diagnostic test, and CANNOT determine viral load, or if someone is infected, symptomatic, or sick or not!

⚫ Here is Kary Mullis, the biochemist to won a Nobel Prize for inventing the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR):

“With PCR, you can find almost anything in anybody. it starts making you believe in the Buddhist notion that everything is contained in everything else…. Because if you can amplify one single molecule, up to something you can really measure, which PCR can do,  … There's just very few molecules that you don't have just one of in your body… [PCR] doesn't tell you if you are sick, or whether the thing was going to hurt you”.

https://youtu.be/iWOJKuSKw5c


πŸ“—πŸ“—πŸ“— There is no such infectious disease called COVID-19. There was no rigorous epidemiological method followed to prove that the suspect pathogen causes the new unnamed syndrome, which I call “Wuhan Sudden Onset Atypical Pneumonia Syndrome”, because this is how it was first described.

⚫ Bill Huston Podcast on Germ Theory of Disease, Epidemiology 101, in the early days of COVID-19, showing problems with the epidemiological method used, and problems with the timeline

https://billhustonpodcast.blogspot.com/2020/09/germ-theory-of-disease-h0ax-pt-1.html

Direct link to the video:

⏩1⏩ https://facebook.com/BillHustonPodcast/videos/356809118707994/

⏩2⏩ https://www.bitchute.com/video/gYFW455L4MmD/

⏩3⏩ https://archive.org/details/COVID19IsNotADisease


I hope this is helpful!